ISO/IEC FDIS 42105 · stage 50.20 FDIS ballot closes 21 October 2026 Planning date 16 Feb 2027, our estimate Official record
OHISO 42105 Revision CheckerHuman oversight of AI systems, before publication

Home / Register / OH-33

ISO/IEC 42005:2025, 5.6

Assessment responsibilities

Unit OH-33 in the Accountability theme. The held citation is ISO/IEC 42005:2025, 5.6, and the row asks for 3 pieces of evidence.

At a glance

Ref
OH-33
Theme
Accountability
Held source
ISO/IEC 42005:2025
Citation
ISO/IEC 42005:2025, 5.6
Evidence
3 items
Gaps
2 common

Evidence to keep

  • Assessment responsibilitiesThe assignment of assessment responsibilities
  • Assessment responsibilitiesEvidence of multidisciplinary participation
  • Assessment responsibilitiesDefined approval and escalation routes

Questions before you sign

  • Who owns the assessment?
  • Which disciplines took part?
  • How did the findings reach management?

The requirement, in our words

Assign and make known the responsibilities for the impact assessment, including setting the scope, securing resources, providing the documented information, involving the right disciplines and approving the result.

What it means for human oversight

The assessment should not be owned by engineering alone. The overseer and the affected-party representative need a route into the assessment, or the oversight design will miss the harm.

How to evidence it

Attach the artefacts above to the Assessment responsibilities row with the system name, the owner and the date. The first one is the anchor: The assignment of assessment responsibilities. The OH-33 file is complete when the named person can produce that artefact and explain the decision it records, without asking someone else where it is.

The reviewer will sample one live decision and ask for Evidence of multidisciplinary participation. If that artefact for OH-33 cannot be produced, the row is a gap, whatever the policy says.

OH-33 carries 3 evidence items and 2 common gaps. For assessment responsibilities, the auditor looks for a named person with an authority, not a committee title, so the row needs both the name and the sentence that grants the power. The OH-33 statement above is ours, written from ISO/IEC 42005:2025, 5.6, not a reproduction of the licensed text.

Common gaps

  • Assessment owned by engineering alone
  • No route from findings to management review
Where the FDIS fits. The public abstract says the draft applies to all types of organizations across the AI system life cycle, so assessment responsibilities is one of the places the guidance is expected to operate. For OH-33, the FDIS clause numbering and wording are not public, so this page cites ISO/IEC 42005:2025, 5.6 above and does not quote the draft.

Related units

Source for this page: ISO/IEC 42005:2025, 5.6. Open ISO/IEC 42005:2025, 5.6 and compare it with the OH-33 statement above. Retrieved 2026-10-21.