Home / Sources
Every source, retrieved 2026-10-21
The sources
The official record and the held standards behind the register. The FDIS body is named and not held; where that matters, the page says so.
01The list
What the site reads
| Source | What it supplies |
|---|---|
| ISO/IEC FDIS 42105, public record | The official ISO page: title, abstract, committee, ICS, page count, edition, stage 50.20 dated 2026-08-26 and the full life-cycle table. The draft body is not public. |
| ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AI management systems | The held management-system standard. The requirement text on this site is our statement of the cited clause, not the licensed text. |
| ISO/IEC 42005:2025, AI system impact assessment | The held impact-assessment guidance that supplies the assessment mechanics behind the oversight register. |
| EU AI Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 | Article 14 is the human oversight duty for high-risk systems; Article 26 is the deployer duty; Articles 12, 13 and 72 cover logs, transparency and post-market monitoring. |
| NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 | The held US voluntary framework. GV-3.2, MP-2.2, MP-3.5 and MN-2.4 are the oversight controls used here. |
| ISO/IEC TS 8200:2024, controllability of AI systems | The parent technical specification that the FDIS abstract says 42105 extends. It is named, not held, so its requirements are not stated here. |
02What is not held
The honest gaps
- The FDIS body. Not public. The site states the public record and the held controls, not the draft clauses.
- ISO/IEC TS 8200:2024. Named as the parent the FDIS extends. Not held, so its requirements are not stated.
- A UK AI statute. Not held. The rules page names the gap and the UK GDPR where personal data is involved.
- A US federal AI statute. Not held. NIST AI RMF 1.0 is the held voluntary framework.
03How to check a line
Check any line yourself
Every unit page links the held source and prints the citation. Open the source, find the clause, and compare it with our statement. If the statement overreaches, write to support@theartofservice.com and it is corrected in the changelog. That is the point of citing every line.