Home / Free scope and date check
Free, no account, about a minute
Does the guidance reach you, and what has to be ready?
Eight answers. A verdict, the rule it used, the days to the planning date, three actions and three units to read. The answers stay in this browser tab.
What the check actually decides
It places you against the public scope in the ISO abstract: the guidance applies to all types of organizations and across the AI system life cycle. It then raises the urgency from the facts that change the duty: whether the output can change a decision about a person, whether the system reaches the EU and is high-risk, whether you claim ISO/IEC 42001, whether oversight is exercisable and when it was last reviewed.
It returns one of five verdicts: out of scope as described, scope incomplete, in scope and act before the planning date, in scope and prepare in the window, or in scope and watch. It never defaults an unknown answer to the lighter pathway.
The limits, stated plainly
- It does not decide whether a specific system is high-risk under the EU AI Act. That turns on the Article 6 classification and Annex III, which needs the system facts.
- It does not decide whether your oversight is effective. It asks whether you say it is documented and exercisable; the evidence is the file.
- It does not give legal advice, does not certify and does not create a presumption of conformity.
- It does not use the FDIS body, which is not public. It uses the public scope and the held oversight controls.
Where the actions come from
The check chooses from the same register the site publishes. These are the first units, and every one is a full page with the evidence and the questions.