Information for interested parties

The requirement, in our words

Identify and record what the organization is obliged to tell interested parties about the system, including regulators, customers and others, with the timeframes and the records of what was shared.

What it means for human oversight

The oversight record is a source for these disclosures. If the organization cannot produce the log, the impact assessment and the review, it cannot meet the reporting duty.

How to evidence it

Attach the artefacts above to the Information for interested parties row with the system name, the owner and the date. The first one is the anchor: A register of reporting obligations with timeframes. The OH-29 file is complete when the named person can produce that artefact and explain the decision it records, without asking someone else where it is.

The reviewer will sample one live decision and ask for Records of information shared. If that artefact for OH-29 cannot be produced, the row is a gap, whatever the policy says.

OH-29 carries 3 evidence items and 2 common gaps. For information for interested parties, keep the version the operator actually received with its date, because the current intranet copy is not evidence of what was in force. The OH-29 statement above is ours, written from ISO/IEC 42001:2023, A.8.5, not a reproduction of the standard text.

Common gaps

• Regulatory reporting duties not identified
• Law enforcement requests not addressed

Related units

• Documented information
• Information for users
• Context and the role you play