ISO/IEC FDIS 42105 · stage 50.20 FDIS ballot closes 21 October 2026 Planning date 16 Feb 2027, our estimate Official record
OHISO 42105 Revision CheckerHuman oversight of AI systems, before publication

Home / Register / OH-20

ISO/IEC 42001:2023, A.4.6

Human resources for AI

Unit OH-20 in the Accountability theme. The held citation is ISO/IEC 42001:2023, A.4.6, and the row asks for 3 pieces of evidence.

At a glance

Ref
OH-20
Theme
Accountability
Held source
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Citation
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, A.4.6
Evidence
3 items
Gaps
2 common

Evidence to keep

  • Human resources for AIStaffing and competence records per life-cycle activity
  • Human resources for AIEvidence diverse expertise was considered, including human oversight
  • Human resources for AIAllocated time for the oversight role

Questions before you sign

  • Who is the overseer for this system, and how much time do they have?
  • Is oversight resourced at transfer and retirement?
  • Is the expertise diverse enough to challenge the system?

The requirement, in our words

Record the people and competences used for building, deploying, running, changing, maintaining, transferring and retiring the AI system, and for integrating and verifying it, with diverse expertise considered.

What it means for human oversight

Oversight must be resourced as a life-cycle activity, including at decommissioning and transfer. A named overseer with no allocated hours is a role on paper.

How to evidence it

Attach the artefacts above to the Human resources for AI row with the system name, the owner and the date. The first one is the anchor: Staffing and competence records per life-cycle activity. The OH-20 file is complete when the named person can produce that artefact and explain the decision it records, without asking someone else where it is.

The reviewer will sample one live decision and ask for Evidence diverse expertise was considered, including human oversight. If that artefact for OH-20 cannot be produced, the row is a gap, whatever the policy says.

OH-20 carries 3 evidence items and 2 common gaps. For human resources for ai, the auditor looks for a named person with an authority, not a committee title, so the row needs both the name and the sentence that grants the power. The OH-20 statement above is ours, written from ISO/IEC 42001:2023, A.4.6, not a reproduction of the licensed text.

Common gaps

  • No competence recorded for decommissioning or transfer
  • Human oversight roles not resourced
Where the FDIS fits. The public abstract says the draft applies to all types of organizations across the AI system life cycle, so human resources for ai is one of the places the guidance is expected to operate. For OH-20, the FDIS clause numbering and wording are not public, so this page cites ISO/IEC 42001:2023, A.4.6 above and does not quote the draft.

Related units

Source for this page: ISO/IEC 42001:2023, A.4.6. Open ISO/IEC 42001:2023, A.4.6 and compare it with the OH-20 statement above. Retrieved 2026-10-21.