ISO/IEC FDIS 42105 · stage 50.20 FDIS ballot closes 21 October 2026 Planning date 16 Feb 2027, our estimate Official record
OHISO 42105 Revision CheckerHuman oversight of AI systems, before publication

Home / Register / OH-18

ISO/IEC 42001:2023, A.3.2

AI roles and responsibilities

Unit OH-18 in the Accountability theme. The held citation is ISO/IEC 42001:2023, A.3.2, and the row asks for 3 pieces of evidence.

At a glance

Ref
OH-18
Theme
Accountability
Held source
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Citation
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, A.3.2
Evidence
3 items
Gaps
2 common

Evidence to keep

  • AI roles and responsibilitiesAn AI roles and responsibilities matrix
  • AI roles and responsibilitiesCoverage of human oversight and the other listed areas
  • AI roles and responsibilitiesEvidence the roles were assigned against the policy, objectives and risks

Questions before you sign

  • Is human oversight a named role with an authority?
  • Does the matrix cover the operator as well as the committee?
  • Is the role resourced with time?

The requirement, in our words

Define and allocate AI roles and responsibilities according to the organization's needs, covering human oversight, security, privacy, safety, performance, development, suppliers, legal compliance, data quality, assets, impact assessment and risk management.

What it means for human oversight

The control explicitly lists human oversight as a role to allocate. The allocation should say what the role may decide, not only what it is called.

How to evidence it

Attach the artefacts above to the AI roles and responsibilities row with the system name, the owner and the date. The first one is the anchor: An AI roles and responsibilities matrix. The OH-18 file is complete when the named person can produce that artefact and explain the decision it records, without asking someone else where it is.

The reviewer will sample one live decision and ask for Coverage of human oversight and the other listed areas. If that artefact for OH-18 cannot be produced, the row is a gap, whatever the policy says.

OH-18 carries 3 evidence items and 2 common gaps. For ai roles and responsibilities, the auditor looks for a named person with an authority, not a committee title, so the row needs both the name and the sentence that grants the power. The OH-18 statement above is ours, written from ISO/IEC 42001:2023, A.3.2, not a reproduction of the licensed text.

Common gaps

  • No role owns human oversight
  • Data quality responsibility undefined across the life cycle
Where the FDIS fits. The public abstract says the draft applies to all types of organizations across the AI system life cycle, so ai roles and responsibilities is one of the places the guidance is expected to operate. For OH-18, the FDIS clause numbering and wording are not public, so this page cites ISO/IEC 42001:2023, A.3.2 above and does not quote the draft.

Related units

Source for this page: ISO/IEC 42001:2023, A.3.2. Open ISO/IEC 42001:2023, A.3.2 and compare it with the OH-18 statement above. Retrieved 2026-10-21.